This is a rough draft. It may contain errors.
I want to equate principal filters (see below) with the elements of the base poset. Such thing can be done using the principles described in the appendix. The formal definitions follow.
Definition of filter objects
Definition Let
for every
. Elements of the set
are called principal filters.
Obvious
is an injection from
to
.
Let
is such a bijection defined on
such that
. (See the appendix for a proof that such a bijection exists.)
Definition Let
. I call elements of
as filter objects (f.o. for short).
Remark Below we will show that
for each
.
Obvious
.
Obvious
is a bijection
.
Proposition
.
Proof
.
Order of filter objects
Proposition
for all
.
Proof
. QED
As a generalization of the last proposition we may define the order on
:
Definition
for all
.
I will call the pair
the primary filtrator.
Theorem For the primary filtrator
we have
for each
.
Proof
for any
. QED
So we have:
is a bijection from
to
.
for each
.
for every
.
A filter object
is represented by the value of
. We are not interested in the internal structure of filter objects (which can be inferred from the appendix), but only in the value of
. Thus the name “filter objects” by analogy with an object in object oriented programming where an object is completely characterized by its methods, likewise a filter object
is completely characterized by
.





